logologologologo
  • Home
  • About Us
    • About SPO
    • Vision, Mission & Values
    • Approach
    • Governance
    • Message by the Chairperson
    • Message by the Chief Executive
    • SPO Networks
    • Organogram
    • Image Gallery
    • Contact Us
      • GRASP Beneficiary Complaint and Feedback Mechanism (BCFM)
  • Flood Response
    • Flood Response
    • Balochistan
    • Sindh
    • Khyber Pakhtunkhwa
    • Punjab
    • Letter of Thanks to the Philanthropists
  • Donate Now
  • Programmes
    • Thematic Areas
      • Social & Economic Development
      • Climate Change Adaptation
      • Cultural Heritage and Tourism Promotion
      • Digital Knowledge Transformation
    • Current Projects
    • Completed Projects
    • Project Briefs
    • Donor Wise Projects
  • Tender Notice
    • Tender Notice Schools Repair 2024
    • Health and Life Insurance
    • Tender Notice – Procurement of IT Equipment 2024
  • Key Support Units
    • Strategic Support Unit
    • Organization Development
      • Finance
      • Internal Audit
      • Administration
      • Human Resource Management
  • Publications
    • Case Studies
    • Annual Reports
    • Policies
    • Writers Corner
    • Latest News
    • Discussion Papers
    • DP&R Publications
    • Communication Material
    • Other Publications
✕

Development denied

  • Home
  • Writers Corner
  • Development denied
Two-Day Consultation on National Human Rights Policy Framework and National Human Rights Defenders’ Mechanism in Pakistan
April 26, 2013
SPO’s Gender Program
April 26, 2013
Published by vakasraja@gmail.com on April 26, 2013
Categories
  • Writers Corner
Tags

Naseer Memon | April 20, 2013.

The United Nations Development Programme recently issued its flagship publication, the Human Development Report 2013. Pakistan has been grouped in the Low Human Development category, ranking 146 out of 186 countries — the position shared by Bangladesh and outshined by most of the other Saarc countries. The country registered zero growth on the Human Development Index compared with last year and relegated by only one rung between 2007 and 2012. Pakistan’s performance on key indicators merits serious introspection.

In the maternal mortality ratio category, Pakistan depicts a dismal picture as the number of dying mothers, 260 per 100,000 live births, is highest in the region, except for Afghanistan which has 460 deaths per 100,000 live births. Sri Lanka has the lowest number — 35.

For infant mortality rate, the country ranks the highest in the region. Out of every 1,000 live births, 70 infants die. Even the Congo has a lower number of such deaths — 61. Other Saarc countries have better records.

With regard to female populations with secondary education, Pakistan has only 18.3 per cent of women at or above 25 years of age with a secondary education. This is far better than Afghanistan’s 5.8 per cent but considerably behind India (26.6) and Sri Lanka (72.6).

In female labour force participation, all countries — except Nepal — have better female participation than Pakistan, with it being a mere 22.7 per cent. Bhutan has an impressive 65.8 per cent.

Regarding the percentage of population in severe poverty, this makes up 27.4 per cent of Pakistan’s population; slightly better than India with 28.6 per cent, yet far higher than Nepal’s 20.8, Bangladesh’s 8.5, Bhutan’s 5.8 and the Maldives’ only 0.3 per cent. Severe poverty has cascading implications that impair performance on other human development indicators.

With regard to social sector spending, Pakistan has a stingy spending record on health and education, which corroborates its lack of political will to improve human development indicators. Both key pillars of human development receive crumbs of the budget allocations. Pakistan spends only 0.6 per cent of GDP on health, which is even dwarfed by highly unstable Afghanistan with 3.9 per cent. Bhutan spends the highest on health in the region — 5.3 per cent. Even the Congo spends twice as much on health — 1.2 per cent. Ethiopia (2.3), Yemen (1.4), Rwanda (1.7), Sudan (2.8) and Nigeria (1.6) deride our image in the international community. Likewise, Pakistan spends only 2.4 per cent of its GDP on education, which is significantly lower than 5.8 per cent of Bhutan and 4.7 per cent of Nepal. The Congo appends 6.2 per cent on this account.

In the category of military spending, Pakistan has the highest in the region after Sri Lanka, 2.8 and three per cent of GDP, respectively. Juxtaposing military spending with the social sector speaks volumes about Pakistan’s misplaced priorities, which leave a large part of society ill and illiterate.

Finally, allotment of seat for women in parliament (per hundred seats) is the only indicator that assuages the country’s sheepish rankings. Pakistan has the second highest percentage of female parliament members in the region (19.7 per cent) and is followed by Afghanistan with 22.7 per cent. Proudly, it is much higher than India’s 10.9 per cent.

Published in The Express Tribune, April 20th, 2013.

Share
0
vakasraja@gmail.com
vakasraja@gmail.com

Related posts

September 17, 2021

Truths and dialogue


Read more
March 29, 2021

The Two-Nation Reality Versus Theory


Read more
December 25, 2020

Saving the Quaid


Read more

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Company Profile

Legal Status
Registration Certificate
License
PCP Certificate
Section 2(36) Certificate
Zakat Exemption Certificate
National Tax Number
Legal Advisers of the Company
Auditors of the Company

WORK OPPORTUNITIES

Internship Opportunities
Consultancies
Full-Time Positions

Quick Links




Copyright © 2025 SPO All Right Reserved.
Website concept, design & developed by Cogilent Solutions.